Love Letters

February 16, 2018

Thanks to Alissa Simon, HMU Tutor, for today's post.

“Sanskrit has 96 words for love; ancient Persian has 80, Greek three, and English only one.” - Robert Johnson, The Fisher King and the Handless Maiden

I think that it would be ideal to have somewhere between 96 and 3 words for love. Certainly, one does not seem enough. It is much like the word nature, which contains so much. When discussing literature, we spend so much time just trying to figure out what type of love we are talking about...what type of love the characters demonstrate. Moreover, we use the same word to say that we love something as silly as ice cream, and something as serious as a lost loved one. The following love letters fit the week's theme, which celebrates St. Valentine. They are an exchange between Nathaniel Hawthorne and his future wife Sophia Peabody. They married in 1842 and had three children and a long marriage. Though both were known to be quiet and reclusive, these letters prove of an intense and passionate relationship.

Nathaniel Hawthorne referred to Sophia as his “Dove” and said that she was his sole companion. He continues, “I need no other - there is no vacancy in my mind, any more than in my heart... Thank God that I suffice for her boundless heart!” After their first child was born, Nathaniel Hawthorne also felt a different kind of love and he voices this profound responsibility of fatherhood. He writes, “I have business on earth now, and must look about me for the means of doing it.”

We wish you health, happiness and love. Contemplate and celebrate the many meanings of love this week!

Nathaniel Hawthorne to Sophia Peabody, December 5, 1839

Dearest, – I wish I had the gift of making rhymes, for methinks there is poetry in my head and hear since I have been in love with you. You are a Poem. Of what sort, then? Epic? Mercy on me, no! A sonnet? No; for that is too labored and artificial. You are a sort of sweet, simple, gay pathetic ballad, which Nature is singing, sometimes with tears, sometimes with smiles, and sometimes with intermingled smiles and tears.


Sophia Peabody to Nathaniel Hawthorne, December 31, 1839

Best Beloved, – I send you some allumettes wherewith to kindle the taper. There are very few but my second finger could no longer perform extra duty. These will serve till the wounded one be healed, however. How beautiful it is to provide even the slightest convenience for you, dearest! I cannot tell you how much I love you, in this back-handed style. My love is not in this attitude, - it rather bends forwards to meet you.

What a year this has been to us! My definition of Beauty is, that it is love, and therefore includes both truth and good. But those only who love as we do can feel the significance and force of this.

My ideas will not flow in these crooked strokes. God be with you. I am very well, and have walked far in Danvers this cold morning. I am full of the glory of the day. God bless you this night of the old year. It has proved the year of our nativity. Has not the old earth passed away from us? - are not all things new?

Your Sophie

- These letters can be found in: Forever Yours: Letters of Love. St. Martin's Press, 1991.

To post a comment, click on the title of this post and scroll down.

A Brief and Tangential History of Mail

September 1, 2017

Thanks to Alissa Simon, HMU Tutor, for today's post.

Harrison Middleton University's upcoming Quarterly Discussion will take a look at a number of historic letters. Personal correspondence offers a rich and fascinating look at culture and society. Dating back to ancient Rome, many letters (that remain today) were considered official documents and would have been kept in the public record. Such is the case with Plutarch's letter “Consolation to His Wife”. Therefore, while the letter is directed solely to his wife, it should be viewed in a broader context. In fact, most statesmen and women have kept meticulous records of letters, notes, and correspondence. These pieces of dialogue give us insight into historical events, lives, trends and so much more. In our Quarterly Discussion, we will view a number of letters, ancient to modern, in an attempt to better understand cultural norms and shifts.

Therefore, I thought it fitting to look into the history of correspondence itself. Since that is a massive project, today's blog hits on only a few random pieces of data to pique your interest. The following statistics are just a sampling of postal-related curiosities that can be interpreted in a number of ways. They give rich insight into historical events, leadership, economics, as well as social constructs. If this list entertains you, or sparks curiosity, please consider joining our Quarterly Discussion. Email for more information. Enjoy!

(Please note that most of this information came from the Statistical History of USPS.)

In ancient Rome, official letters traveled via the cursus publicus, which was a series of forts and stations to provide fresh horses for official couriers. They were meant to be for official use only, but often fell prey to bribes. Unofficial letters would usually have been delivered much more slowly in the hands of a friend, neighbor or acquaintance who happened to travel near the recipient.

In 1520, Manuel I of Portugal created the first publicly available letter carrier service. Charles the I of England followed this example in 1635.

In 1792, the rate to send a letter less than thirty miles in the United States was six cents. In 1816, all rates doubled to raise money for the bankrupt nation, as a result of the War of 1812. (However, the double was repealed one year later).

In 1845, the United States Postal Service (USPS) changed its billing system from “not over 30 miles” to “not over 300 miles”. This, of course, coincided with the rise of the industrial revolution and the railroad. In 1851, the distance changed once again from 300 miles to 3,000 miles.

The number of postal cards (official USPS cards issued through the USPS), has steadily declined since 1951. At about this time, personal cards (a category which includes the kind of postcards one finds on vacation) began to overtake the market. Though still 2 million less than official post office issued notes in 1951, it wasn't until 1968 that statistics prove people preferred to mail personal cards over post office cards. In other words, paper and cards had become its own commodity.

In 1975, USPS began charging for additional weight. Prior to that, it had charged a flat fee based upon distance to destination. We now take for granted that we can order a package from anywhere, anytime, but that service is extremely modern. With better packaging and availability of products (boxes, envelopes, mailers, etc), it became feasible to send larger envelopes and packages.

The USPS began tabulating the amount of presorted postcards in 1977. These promotional cards implies a technological advance in printing and advertising. Perhaps it also implies a growing commodification or a different way of creating and grouping customers. (Personally, I wonder if the distance of these presorted mailers has changed over the last 40 years. For example, if a restaurant wants to be noticed, it no longer relies on passers-by, but sends mail to local neighborhoods. I wonder if the definition of neighborhood has changed in some way and if that change is reflected in the presorted mailing stats?)

In 1997, the USPS combined the categories of stamped postcards with stamped cards (though presorted mail remains a separate category). In other words, mail has declined sharply in a digital age, making it unnecessary to split the two categories.

Though there is no clear trend yet, since the data is too new, it appears that presorted postcards hit a high between 2005 and 2008. Though they have steadily declined, presorted mail currently outnumbers personal mail by a couple of million.

I encourage you to peek at the statistics compiled by the census and USPS. It's vastly entertaining – especially when linked to some sort of reading and discussion.

To post a comment, click on the title of this blog and scroll down.